| Suppo 06/14/2003 03:39:23PM | Paul Walker is a really terrible actor, I've seen Fast and the furious, joyride and 2 fast 2 furious and in every one of them I really thought he sucked. 2 fast 2 furious was ok though, a lot of Bling Bling but that was to expect. The movie basically isn't re-inventing anything but like DCB said, it's good entertainment. One of the most positive points I believe is that there's a lot more of the cool shots from the races (or just the car scenes for that matter). They talk too much though. |
 +Hyena06/08/2003 04:07:12AM | Wasn't really planning on seeing it. But I like your creative touch in topic naming. |
| DCB 06/07/2003 08:39:13AM | 2 Fast 2 Furious:
Pros - High speed action, lots of pretty cars like a hot looking Mitsubishi Lancer and a couple of Dodge Chargers (I think they're Chargers), stars Ludacris and the super hot girls Devon Aoki and Eva Mendez, directed by John Singleton, bumping soundtrack (act a FOOOOL!!!). Cons - Stars Paul Walker who is actually tolerable but still acts a little ridiculous, plot is more defined than the last movie but still fairly simple and at some parts choppy, takes place in Miami which is an okay city but the last one took place in LA, on the whole pretty much a commercial for souped-up cars (when all those drivers started flooding out of that garage at the cops I could almost sense many a car enthusiast popping a boner and/or getting wet). Go see it if you want a fun fast-paced movie, avoid it if you want something a little deeper. |